There is nothing in the whole world as satisfying as putting a fussy baby to sleep. I know, I *remember* the fatigue of caring for infants from when my children were small. But boy, do I feel nostalgic for it. This photo was from one of my personal highlights at the Bear Lake reunion, getting grumpy Evan Babcock to relax and doze. I put my hat on him, and sat down with my back to sun so he wouldn't get sunburned. Thanks Mike and Sarah for letting me flex my Grandpa muscles!
A huge success! This was the 2-liter bottle rocket launcher the Smiths brought, and a great action shot by Jen Babcock of Roxie Jane launcher her rocket. I'm getting one for Christmas!
Sunday, August 17, 2014
Wednesday, August 13, 2014
An Open Letter to Matt Walsh Regarding His Assertion that Suicide Is a Choice
In summary, Matt, you are wrong.
Now, there are a lot of people that think you (Matt Walsh) are wrong, all the time. But that is often because they disagree with your principles of religion, spirituality, and morality.
I disagree with your conclusions, not your principles. I think your vision on suicide is too narrow, and you have missed the mark. I think you have a responsibility to speak from a position of great influence with more care and nuance, and to better represent the spiritually-based life.
You state, over and over again in your article, that suicide is a choice. That Robin Williams chose to do this to himself. I ask, how can you *possibly* know that?
Surely you recognize, as a student of human nature (both biological and spiritual) that a person's behavior is never just one thing. Yes, YES, we have responsibility for the actions we elect. I am certain of that. But we also inhabit a complex system of influences. Genetics, culture, family, history, chemistry, whimsy, temptation. To presume that any person can look at another's choice, and conclude how much of the choice was personal agency, and how much was external factors is ... ludicrous. We, individually, can only ever truly be certain of what we, individually are responsible for choosing. Only we can know our own guilt.
I suspect that you feel some obligation to speak out, a cautionary voice to warn anyone who is feeling suicidal. I imagine that you think expressing sympathy or sorrow for Robin Williams will somehow encourage or enable someone who's depressed, as you say, it will be "the last straw." The specter of copycat suicides is a horrific worry that everyone is always aware of at a time like this. As a culture, we are empowered to judge behavior as acceptable, or as not acceptable. Suicide is something we should judge as unacceptable. And you are right to speak out against turning the conversation into a complete abnegation of personal responsibility on the part of the person who attempts suicide. We, as a culture, as a race, must be unequivocal that Suicide is wrong.
But in your effort to speak out, you have assumed knowledge you cannot possibly possess. You assert that making suicide analogous to other causes of death (beyond the control of the suffering) somehow steals hope.
Hogwash. This is not like coddling a vandal, or a thief. You aren't going to spark a cultural shift towards suicide if you express sorrow or sympathy for someone who has committed suicide. It is like the public forgiving of an addict, the embracing of someone who is anorexic. People suffering with conditions so severe that they might contemplate suicide, they *NEED* to be able to surrender the burden of the suffocating pain. They need to know it is *NOT* something they are in control of, and *NOT* something they will be judged for feeling, so they can get help. From the outside, from others. Yes, it is critical that as a culture we do not praise the choice to suicide, that we condemn the act and plead with any contemplating it to choose life. But it is the act we condemn, not the actor. Love the sinner, hate the sin; when condemning an immoral behavior, we should always frame the condemnation in the abstract, not label specific people as examples of the immoral behavior.
It is hypocrisy for you to accuse people of looking for an easy answer when they ascribe suicide to factors beyond the control of the suicidal, when you yourself are guilty of doing exactly that. You have erred in the opposite direction, though. And while people who write off suicide as being completely beyond the control of the person are wrong, at least they are erring on the side of compassion for the dead. You are erring on the side of the stern, the judgmental. By declaring suicide to be ONLY the choice of the suicidal, you discount as non-existent (or as non-meaningful) the stunning array of factors outside of the control of the suicidal. Let me quote you;
No one admires Robin Williams for his death. I don't think anyone in this public dialog is asserting that someone who commits suicide has NO choice in the behavior. But when they express sorrow for the event, they are expressing a compassionate uncertainty of HOW MUCH choice he had, and attempting to comfort the people left behind.
Shame on you for using such a public forum to judge another human being when you have neither the authority or information to justify your opinion. Your tone, your judgmental stance, your repeated insistence on framing Robin Williams' death as a cruel choice he is alone responsible for, embodies much that the non-religious find despicable about the religious. Where is your compassion for the suffering? How is heaping judgment (which, again, I insist you cannot possibly have enough information to render) on someone who is gone bringing greater joy into the world?
It doesn't matter what percentage of depression's cause is spiritual, what percentage is chemical. The answer is the same. People who are suffering, they need to feel joy, have friends, be medicated, get counseling, seek God, feel connected, choose life. They need the full spectrum of possibility, help and hope to have a chance of combating the black hole of depression. And they need those possibilities to be offered in an atmosphere of tolerance, respect, and welcome. An invitation, lacking judgment.
When someone reaches the end of their mental and spiritual rope, they are no longer rational. I agree with your statements that we are meant for life, and for joy. But I sincerely believe that if a spiritually-minded person read your blog while they were depressed, they would feel judged for contemplating suicide. And that's not helping them.
If someone is contemplating suicide, or any kind of self-harm, they should call the hotline (1-800-273-8255). I have an open, standing invitation to all who might feel that way to call me personally.
Now, there are a lot of people that think you (Matt Walsh) are wrong, all the time. But that is often because they disagree with your principles of religion, spirituality, and morality.
I disagree with your conclusions, not your principles. I think your vision on suicide is too narrow, and you have missed the mark. I think you have a responsibility to speak from a position of great influence with more care and nuance, and to better represent the spiritually-based life.
You state, over and over again in your article, that suicide is a choice. That Robin Williams chose to do this to himself. I ask, how can you *possibly* know that?
Surely you recognize, as a student of human nature (both biological and spiritual) that a person's behavior is never just one thing. Yes, YES, we have responsibility for the actions we elect. I am certain of that. But we also inhabit a complex system of influences. Genetics, culture, family, history, chemistry, whimsy, temptation. To presume that any person can look at another's choice, and conclude how much of the choice was personal agency, and how much was external factors is ... ludicrous. We, individually, can only ever truly be certain of what we, individually are responsible for choosing. Only we can know our own guilt.
I suspect that you feel some obligation to speak out, a cautionary voice to warn anyone who is feeling suicidal. I imagine that you think expressing sympathy or sorrow for Robin Williams will somehow encourage or enable someone who's depressed, as you say, it will be "the last straw." The specter of copycat suicides is a horrific worry that everyone is always aware of at a time like this. As a culture, we are empowered to judge behavior as acceptable, or as not acceptable. Suicide is something we should judge as unacceptable. And you are right to speak out against turning the conversation into a complete abnegation of personal responsibility on the part of the person who attempts suicide. We, as a culture, as a race, must be unequivocal that Suicide is wrong.
But in your effort to speak out, you have assumed knowledge you cannot possibly possess. You assert that making suicide analogous to other causes of death (beyond the control of the suffering) somehow steals hope.
Hogwash. This is not like coddling a vandal, or a thief. You aren't going to spark a cultural shift towards suicide if you express sorrow or sympathy for someone who has committed suicide. It is like the public forgiving of an addict, the embracing of someone who is anorexic. People suffering with conditions so severe that they might contemplate suicide, they *NEED* to be able to surrender the burden of the suffocating pain. They need to know it is *NOT* something they are in control of, and *NOT* something they will be judged for feeling, so they can get help. From the outside, from others. Yes, it is critical that as a culture we do not praise the choice to suicide, that we condemn the act and plead with any contemplating it to choose life. But it is the act we condemn, not the actor. Love the sinner, hate the sin; when condemning an immoral behavior, we should always frame the condemnation in the abstract, not label specific people as examples of the immoral behavior.
It is hypocrisy for you to accuse people of looking for an easy answer when they ascribe suicide to factors beyond the control of the suicidal, when you yourself are guilty of doing exactly that. You have erred in the opposite direction, though. And while people who write off suicide as being completely beyond the control of the person are wrong, at least they are erring on the side of compassion for the dead. You are erring on the side of the stern, the judgmental. By declaring suicide to be ONLY the choice of the suicidal, you discount as non-existent (or as non-meaningful) the stunning array of factors outside of the control of the suicidal. Let me quote you;
How can *YOU* declare that depression is *ONLY* rooted in the soul? Your standard of joy, of choosing life, of not electing self-destruction, that is all laudable, and I agree with them! But I am certain, on behalf of those who suffer from depression (and the family members who collaterally bear that burden), you have done great harm in expressing such a thoughtless opinion, so lacking nuance and understanding.
"I don’t understand how theists, who acknowledge the existence of the soul, think they can draw some clear line of distinction between the body and the soul, and declare unequivocally that depression is rooted in one but not the other."
No one admires Robin Williams for his death. I don't think anyone in this public dialog is asserting that someone who commits suicide has NO choice in the behavior. But when they express sorrow for the event, they are expressing a compassionate uncertainty of HOW MUCH choice he had, and attempting to comfort the people left behind.
Shame on you for using such a public forum to judge another human being when you have neither the authority or information to justify your opinion. Your tone, your judgmental stance, your repeated insistence on framing Robin Williams' death as a cruel choice he is alone responsible for, embodies much that the non-religious find despicable about the religious. Where is your compassion for the suffering? How is heaping judgment (which, again, I insist you cannot possibly have enough information to render) on someone who is gone bringing greater joy into the world?
It doesn't matter what percentage of depression's cause is spiritual, what percentage is chemical. The answer is the same. People who are suffering, they need to feel joy, have friends, be medicated, get counseling, seek God, feel connected, choose life. They need the full spectrum of possibility, help and hope to have a chance of combating the black hole of depression. And they need those possibilities to be offered in an atmosphere of tolerance, respect, and welcome. An invitation, lacking judgment.
When someone reaches the end of their mental and spiritual rope, they are no longer rational. I agree with your statements that we are meant for life, and for joy. But I sincerely believe that if a spiritually-minded person read your blog while they were depressed, they would feel judged for contemplating suicide. And that's not helping them.
If someone is contemplating suicide, or any kind of self-harm, they should call the hotline (1-800-273-8255). I have an open, standing invitation to all who might feel that way to call me personally.
Sunday, August 10, 2014
My Remarks on the Passing of My Son Maxwell
My son, Maxwell Defiance Landbeck, was killed early the
morning of July 13, 2014. I’ve written about Max before, about our
troubles. This post is my effort to make
sense of his death. To find personal
context and peace with it, to see the meaning in our loss and grief. It is comprised mostly of the remarks I gave
at his memorial service, though I've included a few passages from the eulogy his
sister read (the entire eulogy is here).
“Grief is the natural by-product of love. One cannot selflessly love another person and not grieve at their suffering or death. The only way to avoid grief would be to not experience the love; and it is the love that gives life its richness and meaning.”
A little over two years ago, Max was diagnosed with bi-polar
disorder. In the months prior to that, he
struggled with substance abuse. It is
now obvious he was self-medicating. The
burden of bi-polar disorder is swinging between depressive and manic episodes.
For Max, when he was Manic, he would become delusional. Delusions of different
realities, grandiose visions and fantasies. He was never violent, but pursued
his bizarre notions no matter how strange or dangerous.
When Max would use drugs, even marijuana, he became even
more delusional. But he sought out
bizarre drugs, custom hallucinogens, spice, gleefully experimenting with
substances that were not technically illegal.
During these years, family and friends tried to help him, offering
him a place to live if he promised to quit for good. Max was easy to love, but
difficult to live with. Addiction is a
terrible burden. He could not resist the draw of trying drugs one more time.
Each time Max was certain that it would help.
Each time he was terribly wrong.
In the very early morning of Sunday, July 13 Max was struck
by a freight train and killed instantly.
In the days since Maxwell’s death, when I would share the
story of how he died, sympathetic listeners would sometimes ask, “Why?” I am sure they wanted me to know that their
thoughts are with us as we struggle to understand what happened. But I also suspect that they want to know who
to blame. They want to know who *we*
blame.
Did we blame the people who gave him drugs? Did we blame him? Or the train?
Did we think he was suicidal or delusional?
I need to explain something important, and to do it, I am
going to tell a story about Max and me. A frequent conflict we had was about
blame. Specifically, fault; as in, whose
fault something was. Who to blame? Whenever something happened, and Max was
involved, he’d acknowledge that he shared *SOME* of the blame. But he would insist, with prosecutorial
certainty, that since it wasn't *ALL* his
fault, it could therefore not be proven that it was *ANY* of his fault. Even as a first grader, he already had an
intuitive grasp of contributory negligence as a factor in sentencing.
I am certain that Max was wrong about that. This vision of fault or blame, it’s not
true. It’s a distraction, a feint to
excuse yourself from accepting your portion of the blame. With Max, I came up with a metaphor to teach
him my concept of blame or fault; it’s what I call the "Pie" theory
of blame. P-I-E, not mathematical pi.
When something bad happens, the fault for it can be divided
into pieces, sometimes into dozens of slices.
As far as I am concerned, it doesn’t matter how many other people or
factors are involved, it doesn’t matter how big those “slices” are relative to
each other. Every piece of the pie,
every slice, they are *all* responsible. It’s not just the biggest slice of the
pie. I wanted Max to understand and take responsibility for each choice he
made, however complex the motivation behind those choices, no matter how
contributing the circumstances around his choices.
And I understand that as people, we have an instinctive
desire to reduce things to a single cause or a single concept, a lowest common
denominator. It is easier to feel like
we are in control, like our efforts can affect the outcome, if we are fighting
*one* thing. It is especially comforting
if we can affix the blame to some external force, some other person. But life is complex. Individual people are complex. If we could see ourselves with complete
honesty and accuracy, we would see that each of our choices is prompted by
many, sometimes dozens of different motives. Sometimes our own motives conflict
with other motives! Trying to narrow the
cause to one thing is impossible.
My point is that we get lost on the cause, the slices, how
the pie divides up. We lose sight of the
consequence of action when we focus on the cause of action. “Cause” is an equation we can almost never
solve. We are ultimately the sum of our
choices, NOT the things that motivate our choices.
So instead of focusing on the why of his death, looking for
someone to blame, we've looked instead at the consequences. Max's death is many things at once. It was the tragic end of a troubled
life. It was the result of mental
illness. It was the byproduct of profound dysfunction resulting from drug
abuse. But his life is also many things,
many of them great successes. He
repeatedly triumphed over the despair of relapse, trying again and again to
stay sober. He used his native gift for
music and singing to bring joy to hundreds of people this year alone, thousands
over the course of his life. He loved
his family, and he was loved by us.
For the rest of my remarks to make sense, it’s important
that you understand a couple of my fundamental beliefs. I believe in God. I know that each person existed spiritually
before they were born. That belief isn’t
just a metaphor that seeks to mystically capture the connectedness of us all,
it is very literal. I know that God is a
real being, a literal spiritual father to all of us on the earth. I know that we all existed spiritually before
coming to the earth, and that we are here, on the earth, on purpose.
Anyone that knows me personally knows that I am very
committed to the civic process of allowing all to believe whatever they
believe. I talk often about the civic distance, the polite fiction of a space
where everyone might be right, everyone might be wrong. I’m going to set aside that buffer and not
use my usual caveats. I need you read
this like everything I am saying is the Truth.
Like I said, I know God is real. And we are on the earth on purpose. We are here to:
*get a body
*make and keep covenants with God
*make choices with imperfect knowledge and total freedom,
earning the consequences (both immediate and eternal) of those choices
*form and nurture relationships that will last into eternity
If you were born, that’s the “get a body” part. For Max, purpose one has been met, another
way that Max’s life can be viewed as a success; he was, like all of you are,
HERE; he got a body! But like I said, I
see Max’s life as both success and failure.
A jumble of both.
I think most of us acknowledge that "jumbled"
nature of our life. We succeed and
fail. But just like with Max’s death, I
think most people want to know *WHY* we fail.
Why do we make mistakes, why do we do wrong?
All the causes can be neatly divided into two
categories. First there are personal flaws. Our weakness can hobble us in
succeeding. We have to strive to
overcome our own selfish, or proud, or lazy nature. But second, we also have to bear the
temptations of an adversary, Satan. There is a popular image in our culture of
the devil being some kind of honorable opponent, a gentleman with whom we can
bargain, even outsmart. That’s not
true. He has no rules. He wants us to fail, and that’s *all* he
wants.
Of the four earthly purposes I listed, any of those purposes
that Satan thwarts, he counts as a victory.
When he separates us from our families, when we disobey, when he fosters
disbelief, or when he causes us to despair and do nothing, those are all
victories for Satan.
So, which is it, weakness or Satan, that make us fail? Which was it with Max? Was it temptation or personal flaws? I have to be plain, it doesn’t matter why we
fail. It doesn’t matter why we go awry. It doesn't matter why Max failed, why he
stepped in front of that train. As far
as I can discern, in all of our failures, BOTH things are present, weakness and
temptation. So, like with fault, it
doesn’t matter which “slice” is bigger.
I think when we got lost in the argument, that’s another way Satan
wins. We get so caught up in trying to
figure out who to blame, we stop taking responsibility for our choices and stop
trying to be good.
Because what matters is how we act and what we choose. We have the power to shrug off both
temptation and weakness. One of the
great blessings of this life that we have is agency, the power we have to make
choices. And the sum of Max’s choices in
life is that he is gone. I can’t tell
you if it was the drugs or his bi-polar disorder. I don't know if he meant to hurt himself, or
if he was delusional. We’re never going
to know the answer to that question here.
But the time he had on the earth to make choices, to learn,
and to live with us, and to love us is over.
Now I know Max’s spirit still exists. All of his memories his experience, his
personality, charm, playfulness, talent, quirks, the things that made him
loveable, the things that made him maddening, that’s still there. Max is still “alive”.
But one of the purposes of our earth–life is for us to form
and PERFECT relationships that will last into eternity. Lucy Mack Smith said, “We must cherish one
another, watch over one another, comfort one another, and gain instruction that
we may all sit down in heaven together.” It takes a lifetime to hammer out a
relationship with someone else that can last into the eternities. And for now, Max is lost to us.
When my doorbell rang, I knew it was bad news about
Max. I quickly came to realize that I
had a responsibility to explain his life and death, to give context for what
both mean. I am pleading with you, with
all the urgent grief of a bereaved parent, to learn the lessons of my and
Maxwell’s life.
I want you listen to four things now.
Number one; don’t use drugs or alcohol. Ever.
Don’t read this and smugly shrug off the histrionics of another
"Just Say No" parent lecture.
Don't think to yourself that you have an exception, a good reason, a new
study, or a new law. I want to be the unequivocal voice in your ear for the
rest of your life, drugs are bad. Period.
When you use, you thwart a purpose for being on the earth. It distances you from the people who love
you, it distances you from the people that you love. It impedes your ability to choose, to act,
and to serve. It dulls your
faculties. It harms the body that you
have been blessed with. It harms you.
I’m begging you now to stop it. That
there is time, we are all still here.
Stop it, and make the world a better place. Make yourself better. If you’ve been trying to quit, keep trying. If you’ve relapsed, quit again!
Now, that was a pretty heavy lecture that's obviously about
Max and his choices. Number two is
entirely about my failing. Avoid
contention. I consider it one of the
great failures of my adult life that, especially with my son Max, I often
allowed my certainty to lead me to verbal hostility when I'm right. It is inevitable that each of us will be
right about something, and then be confronted by someone else who is COMPLETELY
wrong. It is tempting to demand,
"What were you thinking?!" or, "How many times have I told you?!"
in such situations. I hope it is obvious
I am describing the conflict I had with Max; I was right, and he was completely
wrong. He was SO wrong about his
choices, that it killed him. But I can
testify in hindsight, that my self-righteousness, my unswerving and indignant
reciting of standards I knew would keep Max safe, did no good. It put distance between us. My certainty that he was wrong did not excuse
the anger, and the hostility, and the contention that I created. I am grateful that my wife taught me this
lesson in recent years, that peaceful love is a better response to
disobedience. I was working on this with
Max, trying to rebuild, trying to be less critical. It is possible to have an absolute moral
standard, and NOT be angry. I lost YEARS
of time with Max, just arguing with him, and yes, he loved arguing. But just like I wouldn’t let Max redirect
the blame to others, I cannot shift the blame for this failure. *I* engaged every single time he threw down
that gauntlet. So I challenge you, when
confronted with conflicts, especially within your family, state
matter-of-factly your standard, gently ask kind-hearted questions, and act with
compassion when your loved ones choose the wrong thing.
The third thing, and this is important, is do not
despair. Despair is a tool of the
adversary, whether you believe in Satan or the thermodynamic concept of
entropy. Especially do not despair to
suicide. Whatever you’ve done wrong,
whatever horrors you’ve experienced, whatever failures or burdens you carry,
whatever burdens you have set upon other people, no matter what they are, I can
promise you; you need to be here. You
must keep trying. You must keep
acting. If you ever doubt that, if you
ever reach that point where you feel there is nothing left, you call me. And I will find you, and I will give you the
relentless hug that I can’t give my son.
The fourth thing I want to leave you with is the challenge
to seek the will of God, and obey it.
The great burden of choice in this life is that you will fail, and fail
often, and you will be held accountable for each of those failures. But the great gift of mortal life is that you
can try again. And again. And
again. You can be forgiven. No matter how wrong you have been, you are
still alive, and you must try again to be right.
I ask that you look to Max as both an example to be
emulated, and an object lesson of what happens when you make the mistakes he
made. He failed, and he succeeded. For all of us, every day is both failure and
success, both things at once. We fail, because we do not achieve the standard
of goodness or perfection that God instructs. But we are also victorious,
because we keep trying again no matter how many times we fail. In trying, we conquer evil, we conquer
temptation, and our own weakness.
Do not be discouraged by your own failings. Find courage and motivation in the fact that
Max succeeded *and* failed. Keep
trying. Be more obedient to God’s will,
seek earnestly to know it. Turn away
from the despair that threatens to engulf you.
Seek a more peaceful path with those around you. And be sober.
As a favor to me and my family, I would ask is that if you
have a moment of success, where one of those things happens, where you avoid an
argument, where you choose life, you choose sobriety, please share that story
with me. Every time someone shares
something with me about Max, every time I can talk a little about him, I’m
pursuing my relationship with him. He
might be gone, but I am still here, and I can still make myself better, love
him better.
I know that I’ve made the covenants that will allow Max to
be my son forever. My life’s pursuit
from here out is to live worthy of those covenants so I can be with him and his
brothers and sisters, and my wife. I
know what I am saying is true. And it’s
not just a reflexive response to grief.
I knew these things were true before anything happened to Max.
Thank you for your attention, your thoughts, and your
prayers on our behalf. We have been
comforted and strengthened by it.
I miss him. I love
him. We are going to be OK.
Friday, August 08, 2014
Maxwell's Eulogy
Eulogy for Maxwell Defiance Landbeck
July 25, 1993 - July 13, 2014
Read at his memorial service, July 25, 2014 by his sister, Emmalyn Landbeck Ritchie,
In 1993, Maxwell Defiance
Landbeck was born to Jennilyn Babcock Landbeck and John Stewart Landbeck, III, Brigham Young University students.
Their graduation pictures include him as a 3 week-old baby in their arms.
The first thing you need to
know about Max is that he barged his way into our family. Our parents were earnest about being parents.
They were willing to have many children, but purposefully intended to have five
kids, spaced out relatively evenly. Stewart
and I were almost exactly two years apart, so it was a huge indignant shock
that Jennilyn found herself pregnant again, with Max, only seven months after baby
# 2.
We believe that each person
existed as a spirit before they were born. Coming to earth to be part of a
family is an important part of God’s Plan for each of us. We don’t know how families come together or
the whys of timing. His parents know that Max belonged in our family and that he
picked us specifically, knowing what mortality held for him. He knew the
difficulties he would encounter, and chose to come anyway.
If Max picked his parents, they
at least got to pick his birthday: Concerned
with how big he was getting, the doctor suggested he should be induced a week
early. July 24th is Pioneer
Day, a BIG Utah holiday to honor the Mormon Pioneers. Mom wanted to
see the parades and fireworks. And honestly, she didn't want to miss her
extended family at a big fish fry that afternoon, either. So July 25th was chosen.
Maxwell Defiance Landbeck was
born in Payson, Utah, at Mountain View Hospital. He was a
healthy 9 lbs 9 1/2 ounces, 21 1/2 inches. He had long, silky white blond hair. Max grew to 6 feet 1 inch, 217 lbs. with dark
hair and a reddish blond beard.
His initials spelled out MDL,
which he thought was hilarious, since he was one of the middle children,
surrounded by siblings: older sister
Emmalyn and brother Stewart; younger siblings Suzanna, Samuel, and Roxie.
Max loved word games and
wordplay. He insisted that his Dentist Appointments be scheduled for 2:30. (Point to teeth)
Tooth. Hurty.
Everyone asks about his
name: His older brother inherited John
Stewart Landbeck IV, a strong name. So, what
do you name the 2nd born son? The name
Maxwell comes from Mormon Apostle Elder Neal A. Maxwell, a firm and eloquent speaker
his parents admired. Maxwell was also the first name of one of John's favorite missionary
companions.
In the 1800's people named
children for characteristics the parents hoped the child would emulate. Charity, Providence, Faith, and so on.
The middle name Defiance comes from the notion of defying expectations,
defying wicked or evil influence. From
Genesis: "For God having sworn that
every one ordained to the Melchizedek Priesthood should have power, by faith,
to break mountains, to divide the seas, to dry up the waters, to turn them out
of the their course: To put at Defiance the armies of nations, to divide the
earth, to break every band, to stand in the presence of God; to do all things
according to his will, according to his command…and this by the will of the Son
of God which was from before the foundation of the world.”
In Max’s baby blessing his Dad
said: "We give him a blessing that
he will understand what his name means; that the things he should defy in this
world, are those things which are ungodly, those things which pretend to be
true but are not…"
Before he was a year old his
family moved from Utah to Havre de Grace,
Maryland. Max attended pre-K through second grade in
Meadowvale Elementary, exactly ten steps from his front door. After we moved to Forest Hill, in fourth grade
Max had to pick a music-related class. With characteristic stubbornness Max
resisted all options that involved home practice. So, chorus it was!
Max was contrary and Max was charming. Once, in a church children’s class taught by
his Aunt Sara, he crossed the line once too often by refusing to stay in his
seat. His Aunt gently threatened to take
him out and let his Dad punish him.
Without slowing down, Max crossed the room, took his Aunt’s face in his
six-year old hands, and crooned, “Oh Auntie Sara, I just wanted to get a closer
look at your beautiful blue eyes.”
School boundaries changed and
Max was shifted back and forth from North Harford to Southampton Middle
School
three times in three years. Max’s Southampton choral
teacher, Mrs. Louise Ballard, noted his talent for singing, and recommended he
audition for the Maryland State Boychoir.
Mom drove him down to an
audition in Baltimore one Saturday in the Fall of 2006. Max protested nervously all the way that he
didn't want to do this, getting angrier and more nervous right up until he
walked through the audition doors. He
sang "Battle Hymn of the Republic" and after that the hymn was his
go-to audition piece.
Max was awarded a position in
the Tour Choir, for his beautiful tenor voice.
To his great consternation, he was almost immediately required to
perform with them on a local TV special.
Our family still has it saved on a TiVo.
Julia Mattson, a fellow MSB mom said, "He spent a third of his life with the choir. I remember talking with Max about Boychoir
and seeing his face light up saying ‘I love those guys-they're some of the best
people I've ever known-and I know I am a better person for being a part of it.’" As his voice got deeper and deeper into the
bass range, he moved into the Changed Voice Choir.
His family moved to Aberdeen where Max graduated with the class of 2011.
He toured China with the Deer Creek Chorale, and travelled to Bermuda, Canada, and dozens of American States with the Maryland
State Boychoir. He sang with his school,
All-County and All-state choirs. In
college, Max sang with the BYU Men’s Chorus.
He performed on-stage at Aberdeen High
School as
Daddy Warbucks in Annie. He shaved his head for months and practiced looking
boorish and rich. He did not need to practice the soft heart.
Max was proud of his work
with the Harford Community College Phoenix Theater in “Evita,” and especially proud
of his recent part in the barbershop quartet in “The Music Man.”
Max broke more things than
most teen-aged boys. He broke every bike
he ever rode. And not just snapping off
reflectors, Max crashed into trees, cracked axles, bent handles. He melted the blade on one of Mom’s favorite
kitchen knives trying to pry something out of an electric socket. He broke a friend’s van door, trying to make
it close faster. Once, he broke a
ceramic dish while doing the dishes, and carefully cleaned up all the broken
pieces. Unfortunately Dad emptied that bag of garbage, a piece stuck out and sliced
Dad’s middle finger and hand, leading to a dozen stitches.
He became notorious for
things breaking, sometimes just by being nearby. He leaned against a wall in
the building where the Boychoir practices, and a section of plaster fell
down. Max was holding a hamster and the
tail fell off! After that the Konstans did not let Max touch any of their pets.
Max loved animals.
Maxwell had a scoundrel’s
sense of adventure, but was an absolutely terrible liar. He never got away with
anything. Max once successfully snuck fireworks into our house and then (air quotes)
“accidentally” lit them in our basement. In. His. Hands. This lead to not just
the first but also the second of many emergency room visits.
When told he was not allowed
to eat food in his room, he snuck some down anyway. Max brought an entire yellow onion downstairs,
which he ate like an apple, and was caught by his obvious onion breath.
Once, Dad refused to buy him
a particular candy. Later, when he was caught eating the candy, Max insisted that
a boy choir friend (whose name he immediately forgot) just happened to give him
that *exact* candy.
Max loved to play. He tried
cross county running team, for a day. Tried
wrestling like his older brother, for exactly one day. But quit when he threw
up after his first match.
He was however a champion
Rubik’s-Cube puzzle solver. He could
twist and turn and consistently finish the puzzle in under two minutes. Once he stood on stage with Emily Perry Canady
to demonstrate their solving skills. Then,
as the music swelled, they gracefully traded cubes by tossing them to each
other. Max won the contest, but it’s
likely because Emily had thoughtfully oiled her cube so it would spin easily,
while Max’s was terribly gummy and tough to turn.
Max would never characterize
himself as “lazy” but rather as “efficient.”
Why should he fold and put away clean laundry, when it works perfectly
well to leave it in the basket, and wear it from there?
He was always the last one to
show up. If HE was early, then he would waste HIS time waiting for everyone
else. During the months leading up to
the performance of “The Music Man” the quartet was nicknamed “Where’s Max?”
because when it was time to practice, they had to track Max down.
He could be very childlike. He
loved little kids, jumping on the trampoline with them, watching movies with
them, making funny voices with them.
Max loved to fish with his Grandpa
Landbeck. Max loved high adventure with
the scouts. Once instead of riding his bike he was TOWED on a broken bike.
He liked audio books better
than hard copies.
Max learned to make homemade
granola, and cinnamon rolls. He learned
how to make homemade spaghetti sauce, which he regretted, as he became the
family’s official spaghetti maker.
It was hard to take pictures
of Max. He would play to the camera with funny faces. But ironically, Max insisted
that he hated to do solos. The solos we have of him singing are precious. We
are grateful that he sang "Martha" by Tom Waits accompanied by Jeremy
Harvey at a church talent show, and “When You Say Nothing at All” in his
freshman year at North Harford. Even if getting him to do these solos took some
convincing. We are incredibly grateful for the footage we have of him singing
from “The Music Man” and love that he would turn and sing right to the camera.
Maxwell loved to argue, loved
to be right. He was happy to debate
anyone about anything. He would do anything to keep the argument going, switch
subjects, make up facts, and demand proof of others.
He always had poor impulse
control, which made him both likely to break things, and liable to be the first
to volunteer whenever someone needed help.
He helped move a million people in and out of their homes as part of the
Landbeck muscle men. He helped Daryl Leonetti decorate Havre de Grace and Aberdeen for Christmas, and entertained dozens of people by
wearing his “Blue Man Suit” on Halloween.
For any who don’t know, a
little over three years ago, Max was diagnosed with bi-polar disorder. In the previous year, he had begun to
struggle with substance abuse. It is now
obvious he was self-medicating. The
burden of bi-polar disorder is swinging between depressive and manic
episodes.
For Max, when he was Manic,
he would become delusional. Delusions of a different realities with grandiose
visions and fantasies. He was never violent, but pursued the bizarre notions
that would occur to him, no matter how strange or dangerous.
When Max would use drugs, any
drugs, he became even more delusional. Many friends and family tried to help him. Max
was easy to love, but difficult to live with.
Addiction is a terrible burden. He could not resist the draw of trying
drugs one more time. Each time Max was certain that it would help. Each time he was terribly wrong. He spent
many months living in a sober half-way house, where he hoped to be able to
eliminate the drug-use from the equation.
This year, it seemed his
effort was beginning to succeed. He was
admitted to a residential treatment program where he could concentrate on both
sobriety and mental stability. Maxwell was
sober for most of 2014, earning his four month coin and relapsing only once. He
navigated the demanding practice schedule for performing in “The Music Man,”
something he was immensely proud of, and we were too.
The day before Max died, Saturday
July 12, was his little sister’s birthday.
He spent the afternoon at our family’s home, with his Grandparents and
Great-grandma Billie. He had cake, sang
“Happy Birthday” with our second verse. Max hugged and kissed everyone, saying
“I love you” just like he always did. He teased his little sister until he got
scolded for poking her. He had plans to
join Mom at a Boychoir concert the next day, and have dinner with his family Sunday
night with the Wainwrights. He put in
his Birthday meal request for his favorite birthday food – Pad Thai for dinner
and chocolate cake with pistachio pudding frosting. He arranged to attend
an “Ironbirds” baseball game with his Grandma Sandy and Grandpa John, taking
his little brother Sam and little sister Roxie Jane with him.
That normal birthday Max was
planning never happened. Today Max would have turned 21.
Later the 12th, Max
became delusional. He began sending
strange texts to friends and family. In
the very early morning of Sunday, July 13, Max left his home and walked 4
blocks to the Amtrak line in Aberdeen. He was killed
instantly by a freight train.
We miss him so much. We love Max so much. We have heard regrets from many people, who
have wondered if only they had called him back, or stayed in touch, or reached
out again.
Maxwell’s life has been saved
many times by the love, attention, friendship, and care of hundreds of people
these last few years.
We ask that you remember what
was best about Max. Learn the lessons of his mistakes. If you could have done more, do it now. Serve
the people that are still here. We all
need friends. We all need to be loved.
Maxwell was our brother, our
son, and our friend. We are grateful
that he now rests in peace.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)